Scout helps me with my homework by napping in my bag of textbooks:
I did get a little bogged down my Environmental Law reading. I love acronyms* for their convenience and cleverness, but the legal system REALLY loves acronyms. Especially, as it turns out, environmental protection statutes. I was just starting to get used to the acronyms for NEPA (National Environmental Protection Act ), but today I tripped over the following acronyms that popped up in only three pages of reading on the CAA (Clean Air Act):
NAAQS: National Ambient Air Quality Standards
SIP: State Implementation Plan
PSD: Prevention of Significant Deterioration
NSPS: Nationally Uniform New Source Performance Standards (apparently they didn't think that "NUSPS"was any good, but I personally like it better)
RACT: Reasonably Available Control Technology
LAER: Lowest Achievable Emissions Rate
BACT: Best Available Control Technology
BART: Best Available Retrofit Technology
and, last but not least, NESHAP: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants.
Here's a special sample from my reading: "The three emission standards (under the CAA) applicable to sources that are required to apply for permits under the nonattainment, PSD, and visibility protection programs (now why not just call that "VPP" while we're at it, hhhmm???)--LAER, BACT, and BART--are not technology-based in the same sense as the mobile-source standards, the NSPS, and RACT for existing sources."
...I think this might be why environmental lawyers focus on becoming experts on only one environmental statute.
This extra push on homework is my attempt to make a little more room for my other law and non-law projects I have going this week, some of them more fun than others, for example: skimming the 50+ articles that I have waiting to be read for the two 30-page research papers I will write this semester, practicing piano for my part in Chelsea and Jacob's wedding this weekend, volunteering at the new Ten Thousand Villages opening up in Lawrence (Hooray!), soaking up the joy of having some of my favorite people in town for the wedding (DOUBLE HOORAY!), and catering snacks to the 5th floor of Green Hall every day for the 30 person staff of the Law Review (Hoo...! .......wait a sec...).
That's right, it's my week to provide my hard-working peers with snacks. Another "perk" of making the Kansas Law Review. Actually I really love snacks, so I'm willing to do my part if it means I always have access to a little pick-me-up when I'm hungry halfway to lunch, or falling asleep at my study carrell reading Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code, or both.
I took a break this evening between Secured Transactions and Environmental Law reading to cut a few veggies for tomorrow's veggie-hummus-tray masterpiece:
Mmmmm doesn't that look tasty? The snack menu gets less healthy from here but I thought I'd at least start the week right. Notice also the multiple mugs from tea and coffee, the basil from my garden still waiting to be turned into pesto, and my binder of articles for Law Review research (I don't know why there's a broken clothes-hanger on the table, you'll have to ask CJ).
Alright--20 more pages and then it's to bed with me. Who's ready for another big, fun week?!
1 comment:
Is your resident sushi chef offering to provide a day's treats? Mom
Post a Comment