Feeling a little bit like a fail myself, I decided to strike a happy medium by writing a blog post.
Today I did laundry, washed dishes, sorted out kids' clothes, organized boxes of random household things, dusted bookshelves. As you can imagine, these kinds of tasks give me some time to think about things. What kind of things? Oh, you know, just the normal things, like my ever-present task of adjusting to and trying to understand and fit into whatever cultural practices are currently around me.
(My favorite find in the kids' clothes so far:
David wore this shirt today and came out of his room beaming to show it to me.)
Certain differences stand out very starkly, and since I have spent a lot of my time around kitchens, preparing and talking about food, and eating, something that has become representative of cultural differences to me is.... food.
I spent the last three months adjusting my stomach to the Israeli schedule of a light breakfast around 11, a light lunch at around 2, and then a heavy supper between 8 and 11 pm. Sometimes American tour groups came through who wanted lunch (and a chicken lunch, at that!!) at 11:30 am. There were always gasps of suprise and disgust. How could people be so barbaric, so unnatural? I was often asked to defend this practice, and I found that in that context there didn't seem to be a logical explanation for why we would do things so differently, since the system at hand seemed to be working out pretty well. One conversations went something like this...
"So, if you're already eating supper at 5 or 6, don't you get hungry later?"
"Well, yeah, I guess so, sometimes."
"So you get hungry and eat again later in the evening again? You eat four meals in the day! HA! THAT's why Americans are so fat!"
Here in Germany the eating schedule is a little bit more like what I grew up with: Breakfast before starting the day, lunch at noon, and supper at 6-7 pm. The food itself bears zero resemblance to meals eaten in Nazareth, or at home in the states, for that matter. In this family, at least, lunch is the hot meal of the day, while supper is "Abendbrot": evening bread, very simple sandwiches in fairly small portions.
And breakfast... well, Nutella plays a big role, which is great because Nutella has played an important role in my life as well.
I first became acquainted with Nutella by the name of Nuss Nougat, when Harald and Claudia (yes, the very same ones I am staying with now) visited my family in Porcupine, South Dakota. The introduction of that jar of Nuss Nougat marked a turning point in my life. I remember the reverence with which I thought of that little white plastic canister with round brown lettering. Even though we must have rationed out it's creamy chocolate nuttiness very carefully, I knew the Nuss Nougat era would be a special and short-lived time in my life, and I treasured every moment. My six-year-old eyes had been opened to the bigger world, specifically the bigger world of chocolate eating.
And that world was more amazing than I had been capable of imagining.
At that stage in my life, there were many things that I liked which only were available on very rare or one-time-only occasions--we were on a voluntary service budget, and our main grocery store was a 2.5 hour drive away. So I accepted it at face value that my relationship with Nuss Nougat was bound to be a fleeting albeit sweet affair. And there was a few years lag between when Harald and Claudia imported that much-treasured bread spread, and when my mom discovered Nutella on the grocery-store shelves. One day it reappeared on our table. There was much rejoicing.
But this was still an expensive and rare item in our house, not to be spread on too thick (you had to have just enough to enjoy the taste, without any wasted). And, as my father once sternly pointed out to my sister Rachel, it was not a breakfast food. We had recently been in Germany as a family, and as seems that every German knows, breakfast is not breakfast without Nutella. My dad had to concede that point, but we were not in Germany, we were at home. So for us, Nutella maintained its status as a special food, with the extra distinction of being in the "dessert" category, and therefore (mostly) banished from the pre-afternoon consumables.
In this household, however, these children might have ceased to exist by now if it weren't for the attraction that Nutella gave them to eat at meal-time. I think it might be a main staple of their diet. It's not that Harald and Claudia are just easy going and let the kids eat whatever they want--believe me, there are rules dictating what foods are appropriate for what meals, just like their are rules for what time you eat, and what kind of meal each meal will be. Nutella at breakfast is just one of those rules.
Having experienced a few different styles of eating recently, I've seen how each of the cuisines can represent a balanced diet when treated with the proper respect, cultural wisdom, eating traditions. Let me insert here a little of my one of my favorite authors:
"Once upon a time Americans had a culture of food to guide us through the increasingly treacherous landscape of food choices: fat vs. carbs, organic vs. conventional, vegetarian vs. carnivorous. Culture in this case is just a fancy way of saying ''your mom.'' She taught us what to eat, when to eat it, how much of it to eat, even the order in which to eat it... How you eat is as important as what you eat... The lesson of the "French paradox" is you can eat all kinds of supposedly toxic substances (triple crème cheese, foie gras) as long as you follow your culture's (i.e., mother's) rules: eat moderate portions, don't go for seconds or snacks between meals, never eat alone." Michael Pollan, "Six Rules for Eating Wisely"
With that in mind, and a little bit of caution and moderation, I might feel comfortable letting the dangerously delicious delicacy of chocolate hazlenut spread onto my breakfast table sometimes. (In addition, I might every once in a while also be incorporating breakfasts of Arabic bread, cheese, fresh vegetables, and laban with olive oil).
But at some point you have to draw the line. One thing that I still don't feel the need to have at breakfast is this product:
I thought it was a joke when I first looked at it, or at least that there had to be something special that made this chocolate particularly breakfastey. Nope. It's just chocolate, in very thin slices. It's little chocolate bars to lay upon your bread and call it breakfast.
Logically, is there really any difference between spreading your chocolate on your bread, and laying it on your bread? Not really. I love chocolate, but there is something in me that instinctively rebels against the idea of this as a breakfast food. My Mom (and Dad!) taught me that breakfast is for eggs and toast, healthy cereals, maybe some fruit. Something tells me that for the most part, that's what I'll end up sticking with...